- Page 1, https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz6sxOA5QEswa3Q4UG5fcmVwSGc&authuser=0
- Page 2, https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz6sxOA5QEswNzVZZjZLdTBuXzA&authuser=0
- Page 3, https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz6sxOA5QEswNzVZZjZLdTBuXzA&authuser=0
- Page 4, https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz6sxOA5QEswd1JjLThMeDhrOEU&authuser=0
- Page 5, https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz6sxOA5QEswUFlDdjZneUpvQXc&authuser=0
- Page 6, https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz6sxOA5QEswTW9wdHM1cmhheUE&authuser=0
- Page 7, https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz6sxOA5QEswZGMtU2xheHhqcVU&authuser=0
- Page 8, https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz6sxOA5QEsweVBBQW12REh4dE0&authuser=0
This page will be updated over the next several days as I (a blogger, not an attorney) wade through the arguments and prepare a response based on the posting, to be sent to CPUC. I provided the links above to allow interested SJWC customers to read the actual letter and form their own opinions.
No comments:
Post a Comment